Skip to content

Practice vs tournament

The classic tournament-day question: am I a choker? This recipe puts a number on the gap.

Separate my sets into two groups by `isPractice`.
For each group, compute:
- Total number of sets.
- Average `summaryTotalBuoys` per set.
- Best pass overall (highest `lineOffUs` where `buoyCount >= 4`).
- Average best line off per set.
Best pass per set = longest `lineOffUs`, tiebreaker highest `buoyCount`.
Exclude draft passes and `autoGenerated: true` passes.
Output a markdown table comparing the two groups side by side.
Then in 2-3 sentences, tell me whether I perform better in practice or
tournaments and quantify the gap (e.g., "0.4 of a line shorter on average
in practice").
MetricPracticeTournament
Total sets8714
Avg total buoys per set18.414.1
Best pass overall5.0 @ -354.0 @ -32
Avg best line off-31.6-29.8

You ski about 0.4 of a line shorter in practice than in tournaments on average, and your peak practice pass (-35) hasn’t shown up at a tournament yet — a real but modest tournament-day gap.

“By season (use account.seasonStartMonthDay / seasonEndMonthDay to define windows), has the practice-vs-tournament gap widened or narrowed over time?”

“Show me my 5 best practice passes that I’ve never matched in a tournament. List set ID, date, line off, speed, buoy count, ski site.”

“For tournament sets specifically, group by tournamentName. Which tournaments do I score highest at?”

Tournament round effect. Slalom tournaments usually have multiple rounds. Group tournament sets by tournamentRound and check whether you’re a slow starter (round 1 weak, round 2/3 stronger) or a fader.

Pre-tournament practice. For each tournament, find the practice sets in the 7 days leading up to it. Does strong practice predict a good tournament, or is the relationship noisy?

Confidence interval. Ask the AI to compute the standard deviation of your best line off per set in each group. A wide tournament SD means you’re inconsistent; a narrow one closer to your practice average means the gap is real.